Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Lasers and Fabry Perots - Homework 02

Syracuse University

This is the second homework assignment for Lasers and Optomechanics at Syracuse University.

It is due Monday, February 16, 2026

You will need to complete the questions in this jupyter notebook and submit it via gitlab

0.1Readings

Chapter 1 of Lasers by Seigman: Free eBook

1Atomic Rate Equations

Problem 1 from Chapter 1.5 of Lasers by Siegman

Screenshot 2026-01-04 at 12.54.55 AM.pngfigure_1_29_seigman_lasers.png

2Pulsed Laser Power

problem_1_chapter_1.png

2.1Pulsed Laser Intensity

problem_2_chapter_1.png

3Geometric Series Fabry-Perot

3.1Part A:

Rederive the Fabry-Perot intracavity electric field EcavE_\mathrm{cav} using the fact that the infinite geometric series

n=0xn=1+x+x2+xn+=11xiffx<1\begin{align} \sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n = 1 + x + x^2 + \cdots x^n + \cdots = \dfrac{1}{1 - x} \qquad \text{iff} |x| < 1 \end{align}

Hint 1: Set up some contributing fields EnE_n for nn round-trips.

3.2Part B:

Draw a plot of the first couple of electric fields EnE_n, as well as the total phasor EcavE_\mathrm{cav},

  1. while on resonance,

  2. while just off resonance, ϕrt0\phi_\mathrm{rt} \neq 0, but ϕrt1\phi_\mathrm{rt} \ll 1.

3.3Part C:

The previous parts we’ve assumed there is zero delay in the propogation time: i.e that the fields in the cavity are in steady state. Now let’s relax this assumption.

What will be the response of the Fabry-Perot intracavity field EcavE_\mathrm{cav} to a step input EinE_\mathrm{in}?

For simplicity, assume that the input laser is exactly on resonance, such that ei2kL=1e^{i 2 k L} = 1

  1. What is the round-trip time delay time τrt\tau_{rt} of the cavity?

  2. How much time tt must elapse for the nnth term of EnE_n to start contributing? Write an expression for nn in terms of tt and τrt\tau_{rt}.

  3. Using a partial geometric series, what is the buildup for the cavity Ecav(n)E_\mathrm{cav}(n) after nn terms are summed together?

  4. Using the model 1exp(t/τstorage)1 - \exp(-t / \tau_\mathrm{storage}), calculate the cavity storage time τstorage\tau_\mathrm{storage}.

  5. Compare your result to the cavity pole νp\nu_p.

4Finesse and Loss in a Fabry-Perot

A very convenient relationship between total loss in a cavity Ltotal\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{total} and cavity finesse F\mathcal{F} can be calculated to be (in the high-finesse limit F1\mathcal{F} \gg 1):

F=2πLtotal\begin{align} \mathcal{F} = \dfrac{2 \pi}{\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{total}} \end{align}

Derive this result starting with F=FSRνFWHM\mathcal{F} = \dfrac{\mathrm{FSR}}{\nu_\mathrm{FWHM}}.

Hint 1: Total loss includes transmission losses for both mirrors: Ltotal=T1+T2+L1+L2\mathcal{L}_\mathrm{total} = T_1 + T_2 + \mathcal{L}_1 + \mathcal{L}_2.

Hint 2: Write r=1TLr = \sqrt{1 - T - \mathcal{L}}.

Hint 3: Use the binomial approximation.

Hint 4: This paper from MIT may be helpful: Loss in long-storage-time optical cavities

5Finesse and Gain in a Fabry-Perot

5.1Part A:

Assuming that we have a critically-coupled Fabry-Perot cavity,
what is the comparison between the finesse F\mathcal{F} and power gain GcavG_\mathrm{cav}?

5.2Part B:

Repeat Part A above for an over-coupled cavity such that r21r_2 \approx 1.
Does the relationship change?

6Reflection Phase Angle vs Frequency

reflection_phase_angle_vs_frequency.png

6.1Plots

Make Bode plots of the reflection phase vs round-trip phase where ϕ\phi serves as the x-axis.
Hint: This is similar to our expressions θ(ϕ)\theta(\phi), where θ\theta is the reflection phase, and ϕ\phi is the round-trip phase.

7Cavity Measurement and Modeling (Extra Credit)

cavity_params_from_measurement.png

8Laser Inertial Confinement Fusion (Extra Credit)

problem_6a_chapter_1.pngproblem_6b_chapter_1.png

9Heating Effects (Extra Credit)

problem_5_chapter_1.png